| Title |
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sex-Specific COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thushara Galbadage, Brent M. Peterson, Joseph Awada, Alison S. Buck, Danny A. Ramirez, Jason Wilson, Richard S. Gunasekera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#621,418
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#165
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,718
of 400,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#12
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.