↓ Skip to main content

Semantic and Geographical Analysis of COVID-19 Trials Reveals a Fragmented Clinical Research Landscape Likely to Impair Informativeness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Semantic and Geographical Analysis of COVID-19 Trials Reveals a Fragmented Clinical Research Landscape Likely to Impair Informativeness
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.00367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Tini, Bruno Achutti Duso, Federica Bellerba, Federica Corso, Sara Gandini, Saverio Minucci, Pier Giuseppe Pelicci, Luca Mazzarella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,201,324
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,435
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,550
of 399,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#85
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.