You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biologic Sequencing in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: After Secondary Non-response to Rituximab, Switching to Humanised Anti-CD20 Agent Is More Effective Than Belimumab
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00498 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabih Ul Hassan, Yuzaiful Md Yusof, Paul Emery, Shouvik Dass, Edward M. Vital |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 40% |
Sweden | 1 | 7% |
Egypt | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Peru | 1 | 7% |
Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,660,113
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#888
of 5,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,569
of 399,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#50
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.