You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: A Review of Recent Progress With a Look Toward the Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.559789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenkang Wang, Chuanjie Xu, Xinglong Ma, Xiaoming Zhang, Peng Xie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 91 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 99 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,874,194
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,575
of 5,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,476
of 508,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#81
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.