You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Weak Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Is Associated With Postoperative Organ Failure in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.613518 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Clavier, Zoé Demailly, Xavier Semaille, Caroline Thill, Jean Selim, Benoit Veber, Fabien Doguet, Vincent Richard, Emmanuel Besnier, Fabienne Tamion |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 86% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,285,812
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,440
of 5,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,651
of 548,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#106
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.