You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Early vs. Delayed or No Intubation on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19: An Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.614152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilias I. Siempos, Eleni Xourgia, Theodora K. Ntaidou, Dimitris Zervakis, Eleni E. Magira, Anastasia Kotanidou, Christina Routsi, Spyros G. Zakynthinos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,303,361
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#951
of 7,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,124
of 522,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#53
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.