↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Accuracy of Early Warning Scores for Clinical Deterioration in Patients With COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic Accuracy of Early Warning Scores for Clinical Deterioration in Patients With COVID-19
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.624255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Su, Min-jie Ju, Rong-cheng Xie, Shen-ji Yu, Ji-li Zheng, Guo-guang Ma, Kai Liu, Jie-fei Ma, Kai-huan Yu, Guo-wei Tu, Zhe Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,252,993
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,454
of 5,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,836
of 505,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#149
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.