You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison Between Cultivation and Sequencing Based Approaches for Microbiota Analysis in Swabs and Biopsies of Chronic Wounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.607255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aleksander Mahnic, Vesna Breznik, Maja Bombek Ihan, Maja Rupnik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,554,120
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,583
of 5,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,652
of 447,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#172
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.