You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of a Point of Care Test for Detecting IgM and IgG Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 and Seroprevalence in Blood Donors and Health Care Workers in Panama
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.616106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alcibiades Villarreal, Giselle Rangel, Xu Zhang, Digna Wong, Gabrielle Britton, Patricia L. Fernandez, Ambar Pérez, Diana Oviedo, Carlos Restrepo, María B. Carreirra, Dilcia Sambrano, Gilberto A. Eskildsen, Carolina De La Guardia, Julio Flores-Cuadra, Jean-Paul Carrera, Yamitzel Zaldivar, Danilo Franco, Sandra López-Vergès, Dexi Zhang, Fangjing Fan, Baojun Wang, Xavier Sáez-Llorens, Rodrigo DeAntonio, Ivonne Torres-Atencio, Isabel Blanco, Fernando Diaz Subía, Laiss Mudarra, Aron Benzadon, Walter Valverde, Lineth López, Nicolás Hurtado, Neyla Rivas, Julio Jurado, Aixa Carvallo, Juan Rodriguez, Yaseikiry Perez, Johanna Morris, Odemaris Luque, David Cortez, Eduardo Ortega-Barria, Rao Kosagisharaf, Ricardo Lleonart, Chong Li, Amador Goodridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Panama | 15 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,043,432
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#590
of 7,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,490
of 454,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#40
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.