You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Clinical Phenotypes in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Related to COVID-19: The COVADIS Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.632933 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Aurelie Gaultier, Thibaud Soumagne, Nicolas Serck, Bertrand Sauneuf, Michael Piagnerelli, Andre Ly, Francois Lejeune, Laurent Lefebvre, Sami Hraiech, Geoffrey Horlait, Julien Higny, Alain D'hondt, Stephane Gaudry, Romain Courcelle, Giuseppe Carbutti, Gauthier Blonz, Gregoire Ottavy, Nadia Aissaoui, Christophe Vinsonneau, Benoit Vandenbunder, Julien Textoris, Piotr Szychowiak, David Grimaldi, the COVADIS study group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 40% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,143,905
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#282
of 6,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,456
of 423,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#20
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.