You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk of Clinically Relevant Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.647917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johannes Gratz, Marion Wiegele, Mathias Maleczek, Harald Herkner, Herbert Schöchl, Eva Chwala, Paul Knöbl, Eva Schaden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,336,629
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,967
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,182
of 423,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#183
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.