You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Dysbiosis in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.671714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Battaglini, Chiara Robba, Andrea Fedele, Sebastian Trancǎ, Samir Giuseppe Sukkar, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Matteo Bassetti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Nicolò Patroniti, Lorenzo Ball, Iole Brunetti, Antoni Torres Martí, Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco, Paolo Pelosi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 38% |
| Brazil | 5 | 19% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,190,068
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#326
of 6,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,794
of 438,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#26
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.