You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a Peer-Led Pain Management Program in Relieving Chronic Pain and Enhancing Pain Self-Efficacy Among Older Adults: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.709141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mimi M. Y. Tse, Shamay S. M. Ng, Paul H. Lee, Xue Bai, Raymond Lo, Shuk Kwan Tang, Ka Long Chan, Yajie Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,165,519
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,998
of 5,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,024
of 431,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#148
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.