↓ Skip to main content

Cost of Myopia Correction: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 7,346)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
77 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost of Myopia Correction: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.718724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Lian Foo, Carla Lanca, Chee Wai Wong, Daniel Ting, Ecosse Lamoureux, Seang-Mei Saw, Marcus Ang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 23 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 630. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#36,032
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#21
of 7,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,199
of 520,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#4
of 598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.