You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragm Thickness and Thickening: Reference Values and Limits of Normality When in a Seated Position
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.742703 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alain Boussuges, Sarah Rives, Julie Finance, Guillaume Chaumet, Nicolas Vallée, Jean-Jacques Risso, Fabienne Brégeon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,935,748
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,728
of 6,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,610
of 443,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#222
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.