↓ Skip to main content

Intermediate- vs. Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted in Medical Ward: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermediate- vs. Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted in Medical Ward: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.747527
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Smadja, Guillaume Bonnet, Nicolas Gendron, Orianne Weizman, Lina Khider, Antonin Trimaille, Tristan Mirault, Charles Fauvel, Jean-Luc Diehl, Delphine Mika, Aurelien Philippe, Théo Pezel, Guillaume Goudot, Willy Sutter, Benjamin Planquette, Victor Waldmann, Olivier Sanchez, Ariel Cohen, Richard Chocron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 10 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 10 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,030,117
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,934
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,779
of 435,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#159
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.