You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Severe COVID-19 Associated With Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.751636 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renato Fraga Righetti, Samantha Torres Grams, Wesla Neves da Silva Costa, Leandro Teixeira Saraiva, Isabel Chateaubriand Diniz de Salles, Wellington Pereira Yamaguti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,129,458
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,975
of 5,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,527
of 437,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#188
of 645 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 645 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.