You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Global, Regional, and National Burden and Trends of Infective Endocarditis From 1990 to 2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.774224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huilong Chen, Yuan Zhan, Kaimin Zhang, Yiping Gao, Liyuan Chen, Juan Zhan, Zirui Chen, Zhilin Zeng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#133,053
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#55
of 6,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,423
of 431,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#6
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.