↓ Skip to main content

Aging of Pelvic Floor in Animal Models: A Sistematic Review of Literature on the Role of the Extracellular Matrix in the Development of Pelvic Floor Prolapse

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aging of Pelvic Floor in Animal Models: A Sistematic Review of Literature on the Role of the Extracellular Matrix in the Development of Pelvic Floor Prolapse
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.863945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Gardella, Annachiara Licia Scatigno, Giacomo Belli, Andrea Gritti, Silvia Damiana Visoná, Mattia Dominoni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Engineering 4 22%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,989,995
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,234
of 6,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,492
of 441,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#391
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.