You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid Generation of In-House Serological Assays Is Comparable to Commercial Kits Critical for Early Response to Pandemics: A Case With SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.864972 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heidi Auerswald, Chanreaksmey Eng, Sokchea Lay, Saraden In, Sokchea Eng, Hoa Thi My Vo, Charya Sith, Sokleaph Cheng, Gauthier Delvallez, Vann Mich, Ngy Meng, Ly Sovann, Kraing Sidonn, Jessica Vanhomwegen, Tineke Cantaert, Philippe Dussart, Veasna Duong, Erik A. Karlsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,069,925
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,354
of 6,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,126
of 444,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#194
of 585 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 585 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.