You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Detection: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.870738 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maniya Arshadi, Fatemeh Fardsanei, Behnaz Deihim, Zahra Farshadzadeh, Farhad Nikkhahi, Farima Khalili, Giovanni Sotgiu, Amir Hashem Shahidi Bonjar, Rosella Centis, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Mehdi Mirsaeidi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,138
of 7,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,150
of 447,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#261
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.