You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perioperative Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients at Risk for Delirium – A Randomized-Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.893459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristina E. Fuest, Ariane Servatius, Bernhard Ulm, Stefan J. Schaller, Bettina Jungwirth, Manfred Blobner, Sebastian Schmid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,396,228
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,491
of 5,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,486
of 435,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#218
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.