You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Jinhua Qinggan granules for non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.928468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhammad Raza Shah, Samreen Fatima, Sehrosh Naz Khan, Shafi Ullah, Gulshan Himani, Kelvin Wan, Timothy Lin, Johnson Y. N. Lau, Qingquan Liu, Dennis S. C. Lam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,448,752
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,418
of 7,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,952
of 432,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#154
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.