You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An exome-wide study of renal operational tolerance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.976248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annick Massart, Richard Danger, Catharina Olsen, Mary J. Emond, Ondrej Viklicky, Valérie Jacquemin, Julie Soblet, Sarah Duerinckx, Didier Croes, Camille Perazzolo, Petra Hruba, Dorien Daneels, Ben Caljon, Mehmet Sukru Sever, Julio Pascual, Marius Miglinas, the Renal Tolerance Investigators, Isabelle Pirson, Lidia Ghisdal, Guillaume Smits, Magali Giral, Daniel Abramowicz, Marc Abramowicz, Sophie Brouard, Maria Aguilar Rodríguez, Friederike Bachmann, Rajendra Bahadur Shahi, Frederike Bemelman, Luboslav Bena, Luigi Biancone, Laura Braun, Klemens Budde, Alejandro Camargo-Salamanca, Katia Clemente, Hulya Colak, Adrian Covic, Jacques Degreve, Philippe Gatault, François Glowacki, Karine Hadaya, Marc Hazzan, Bénédicte Janbon, Christophe Legendre, Umberto Maggiore, Marius Miglinas, Anja Mühlfeld, Maarten Naesens, Christian Noël, Rainer Oberbauer, Evangeline Pillebout, Gian Benedetto Piredda, Francesco Pisani, Ana Ramírez Puga, Tomas Reischig, Francisco González-Roncero, Søren Schwartz Sørensen, Daniel Seron Micas, Nurhan Seyahi, Dimitrie Siriopol, Goce Spasovski, Jean-François Subra, Erik Teugels, Serhan Tuǧlular, Sonia Van Dooren, Catheline Vilain, Florence Villemain, Xavier Warling, Bruno Watschinger, Laurent Weekers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#13,951,135
of 23,882,990 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,285
of 6,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,462
of 290,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#49
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,882,990 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.