↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective analysis of normal saline and lactated ringers as resuscitation fluid in sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective analysis of normal saline and lactated ringers as resuscitation fluid in sepsis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1071741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shahin Isha, Parthkumar H. Satashia, Siva Naga S. Yarrarapu, Austin B. Govero, Michael F. Harrison, Hassan Z. Baig, Pramod Guru, Anirban Bhattacharyya, Colleen T. Ball, Sean M. Caples, Ami A. Grek, Michael R. Vizzini, Syed Anjum Khan, Katherine J. Heise, Hiroshi Sekiguchi, Warren L. Cantrell, Jeffrey D. Smith, Sanjay Chaudhary, Karthik Gnanapandithan, Kristine M. Thompson, Charles G. Graham, Jed C. Cowdell, Aleksandra Murawska Baptista, Claudia R. Libertin, Pablo Moreno Franco, Devang K. Sanghavi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,717,137
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,950
of 7,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,641
of 426,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#161
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.