You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heparin-based versus bivalirudin-based anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1137134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos A. Valdes, Omar M. Sharaf, Mark S. Bleiweis, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Mohammed Mumtaz, Ramy M. Sharaf, Eric I. Jeng, Giles J. Peek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,988,013
of 25,117,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#567
of 7,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,570
of 415,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#19
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,117,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.