You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1172434 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Candelaria de Haro, Ary Serpa Neto, Gemma Gomà, Maria Elena González, Alfonso Ortega, Catalina Forteza, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Raquel García, Fabienne D. Simonis, Federico Gordo-Vidal, David Suarez, Marcus J. Schultz, Antonio Artigas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 6 | 11% |
Mexico | 6 | 11% |
Spain | 4 | 7% |
Guatemala | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 31 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 52 | 93% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Librarian | 2 | 18% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,015,037
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#290
of 7,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,322
of 389,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#10
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.