You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A patient-driven registry on Behçet’s disease: the AIDA for patients pilot project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1188021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Gaggiano, Alessandra Del Bianco, Jurgen Sota, Stefano Gentileschi, Piero Ruscitti, Roberto Giacomelli, Matteo Piga, Francesca Crisafulli, Sara Monti, Giacomo Emmi, Amato De Paulis, Antonio Vitale, Maria Tarsia, Valeria Caggiano, Rossana Nuzzolese, Veronica Parretti, Claudia Fabiani, Giuseppe Lopalco, Armin Maier, Marco Cattalini, Donato Rigante, Marcello Govoni, Francesca Li Gobbi, Serena Guiducci, Paola Parronchi, Achille Marino, Francesco Ciccia, Maria Cristina Maggio, Emma Aragona, Elena Bartoloni, Annamaria Iagnocco, Ombretta Viapiana, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Silvana Guerriero, Antonella Insalaco, Emanuela Del Giudice, Giovanni Conti, Patrizia Barone, Alma Nunzia Olivieri, Antonio Brucato, Francesco Carubbi, Paola Triggianese, Angela Mauro, Gian Marco Tosi, Alex Fonollosa, Henrique Ayres Mayrink Giardini, Gaafar Ragab, Samar Tharwat, José Hernández-Rodríguez, Petros P. Sfikakis, Katerina Laskari, Anastasios Karamanakos, Gerard Espinosa, Farhad Shahram, Haner Direskeneli, Andrea Hinojosa-Azaola, Daniela Opris-Belinski, Ibrahim A. AlMaghlouth, Gülen Hatemi, Mehmet Akif Eksin, Fatos Önen, Ewa Więsik-Szewczyk, Nurullah Akkoç, Abdurrahman Tufan, Ali Şahin, Şükran Erten, Seza Ozen, Ezgi Deniz Batu, Bruno Frediani, Alberto Balistreri, Luca Cantarini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
| Psychology | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,838,856
of 24,039,735 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,668
of 6,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,016
of 241,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#56
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,039,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.