↓ Skip to main content

Updates in SJS/TEN: collaboration, innovation, and community

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Updates in SJS/TEN: collaboration, innovation, and community
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1213889
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeline E. Marks, Ramya Krishna Botta, Riichiro Abe, Thomas M. Beachkofsky, Isabelle Boothman, Bruce C. Carleton, Wen-Hung Chung, Ricardo R. Cibotti, Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Christian Grimstein, Akito Hasegawa, Jay H. Hoofnagle, Shuen-Iu Hung, Benjamin Kaffenberger, Daniela Kroshinsky, Rannakoe J. Lehloenya, Michelle Martin-Pozo, Robert G. Micheletti, Maja Mockenhaupt, Keisuke Nagao, Suman Pakala, Amy Palubinsky, Helena B. Pasieka, Jonathan Peter, Munir Pirmohamed, Melissa Reyes, Hajirah N. Saeed, Jeffery Shupp, Chonlaphat Sukasem, Jhih Yu Syu, Mayumi Ueta, Li Zhou, Wan-Chun Chang, Patrice Becker, Teresa Bellon, Kemberlee Bonnet, Gianpiero Cavalleri, James Chodosh, Anna K. Dewan, Arturo Dominguez, Xinzhong Dong, Elena Ezhkova, Esther Fuchs, Jennifer Goldman, Sonia Himed, Simon Mallal, Alina Markova, Kerry McCawley, Allison E. Norton, David Ostrov, Michael Phan, Arthur Sanford, David Schlundt, Daniel Schneider, Neil Shear, Kanade Shinkai, Eric Tkaczyk, Jason A. Trubiano, Simona Volpi, Charles S. Bouchard, Sherrie J. Divito, Elizabeth J. Phillips

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 31%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,954,466
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,732
of 6,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,347
of 233,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#18
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.