You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A decade of insight: bibliometric analysis of gut microbiota’s role in osteoporosis (2014–2024)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1409534 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhi Qiang Luo, Ya Jing Huang, Ze Hua Chen, Chen Yin Lu, Biao Zhou, Xiang Hao Gong, Zhen Shen, Tao Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,238,870
of 26,107,981 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,130
of 7,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,842
of 209,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#28
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.