You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inferring the Frank–Starling Curve From Simultaneous Venous and Arterial Doppler: Measurements From a Wireless, Wearable Ultrasound Patch
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medical Technology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmedt.2021.676995 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jon-Émile S. Kenny, Igor Barjaktarevic, David C. Mackenzie, Philippe Rola, Korbin Haycock, Andrew M. Eibl, Joseph K. Eibl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,623,031
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#16
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,031
of 457,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medical Technology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.