↓ Skip to main content

Profiles of Microbial Fatty Acids in the Human Metabolome are Disease-Specific

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profiles of Microbial Fatty Acids in the Human Metabolome are Disease-Specific
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhanna A. Ktsoyan, Natalia V. Beloborodova, Anahit M. Sedrakyan, George A. Osipov, Zaruhi A. Khachatryan, Denise Kelly, Gayane P. Manukyan, Karine A. Arakelova, Alvard I. Hovhannisyan, Andrey Y. Olenin, Arsen A. Arakelyan, Karine A. Ghazaryan, Rustam I. Aminov

Abstract

The human gastrointestinal tract is inhabited by a diverse and dense symbiotic microbiota, the composition of which is the result of host-microbe co-evolution and co-adaptation. This tight integration creates intense cross-talk and signaling between the host and microbiota at the cellular and metabolic levels. In many genetic or infectious diseases the balance between host and microbiota may be compromised resulting in erroneous communication. Consequently, the composition of the human metabolome, which includes the gut metabolome, may be different in health and disease states in terms of microbial products and metabolites entering systemic circulation. To test this hypothesis, we measured the level of hydroxy, branched, cyclopropyl and unsaturated fatty acids, aldehydes, and phenyl derivatives in blood of patients with a hereditary autoinflammatory disorder, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), and in patients with peptic ulceration (PU) resulting from Helicobacter pylori infection. Discriminant function analysis of a data matrix consisting of 94 cases as statistical units (37 FMF patients, 14 PU patients, and 43 healthy controls) and the concentration of 35 microbial products in the blood as statistical variables revealed a high accuracy of the proposed model (all cases were correctly classified). This suggests that the profile of microbial products and metabolites in the human metabolome is specific for a given disease and may potentially serve as a biomarker for disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Russia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,939
of 24,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,077
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#70
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.