↓ Skip to main content

Functional Metagenomic Investigations of the Human Intestinal Microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Metagenomic Investigations of the Human Intestinal Microbiota
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aimee M. Moore, Christian Munck, Morten O. A. Sommer, Gautam Dantas

Abstract

The human intestinal microbiota encode multiple critical functions impacting human health, including metabolism of dietary substrate, prevention of pathogen invasion, immune system modulation, and provision of a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes accessible to pathogens. The complexity of this microbial community, its recalcitrance to standard cultivation, and the immense diversity of its encoded genes has necessitated the development of novel molecular, microbiological, and genomic tools. Functional metagenomics is one such culture-independent technique, used for decades to study environmental microorganisms, but relatively recently applied to the study of the human commensal microbiota. Metagenomic functional screens characterize the functional capacity of a microbial community, independent of identity to known genes, by subjecting the metagenome to functional assays in a genetically tractable host. Here we highlight recent work applying this technique to study the functional diversity of the intestinal microbiota, and discuss how an approach combining high-throughput sequencing, cultivation, and metagenomic functional screens can improve our understanding of interactions between this complex community and its human host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 211 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 26%
Researcher 53 22%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 28 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,274,954
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,998
of 24,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,182
of 180,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#70
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.