You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joana Silva, Daniela Leite, Mariana Fernandes, Cristina Mena, Paul Anthony Gibbs, Paula Teixeira |
| Abstract |
Campylobacter is well recognized as the leading cause of bacterial foodborne diarrheal disease worldwide. Symptoms can range from mild to serious infections of the children and the elderly and permanent neurological symptoms. The organism is a cytochrome oxidase positive, microaerophilic, curved Gram-negative rod exhibiting corkscrew motility and is carried in the intestine of many wild and domestic animals, particularly avian species including poultry. Intestinal colonization results in healthy animals as carriers. In contrast with the most recent published reviews that cover specific aspects of Campylobacter/campylobacteriosis, this broad review aims at elucidating and discussing the (i) genus Campylobacter, growth and survival characteristics; (ii) detection, isolation and confirmation of Campylobacter; (iii) campylobacteriosis and presence of virulence factors; and (iv) colonization of poultry and control strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 889 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 862 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 175 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 154 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 100 | 11% |
| Researcher | 83 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 105 | 12% |
| Unknown | 234 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 223 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 107 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 72 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 67 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 12% |
| Unknown | 261 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,144,322
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,646
of 24,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,655
of 181,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.