↓ Skip to main content

Is the Genetic Landscape of the Deep Subsurface Biosphere Affected by Viruses?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Genetic Landscape of the Deep Subsurface Biosphere Affected by Viruses?
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rika E. Anderson, William J. Brazelton, John A. Baross

Abstract

Viruses are powerful manipulators of microbial diversity, biogeochemistry, and evolution in the marine environment. Viruses can directly influence the genetic capabilities and the fitness of their hosts through the use of fitness factors and through horizontal gene transfer. However, the impact of viruses on microbial ecology and evolution is often overlooked in studies of the deep subsurface biosphere. Subsurface habitats connected to hydrothermal vent systems are characterized by constant fluid flux, dynamic environmental variability, and high microbial diversity. In such conditions, high adaptability would be an evolutionary asset, and the potential for frequent host-virus interactions would be high, increasing the likelihood that cellular hosts could acquire novel functions. Here, we review evidence supporting this hypothesis, including data indicating that microbial communities in subsurface hydrothermal fluids are exposed to a high rate of viral infection, as well as viral metagenomic data suggesting that the vent viral assemblage is particularly enriched in genes that facilitate horizontal gene transfer and host adaptability. Therefore, viruses are likely to play a crucial role in facilitating adaptability to the extreme conditions of these regions of the deep subsurface biosphere. We also discuss how these results might apply to other regions of the deep subsurface, where the nature of virus-host interactions would be altered, but possibly no less important, compared to more energetic hydrothermal systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 116 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 9%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,089
of 24,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,216
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#50
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.