↓ Skip to main content

Measles Virus Hemagglutinin: Structural Insights into Cell Entry and Measles Vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measles Virus Hemagglutinin: Structural Insights into Cell Entry and Measles Vaccine
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takao Hashiguchi, Katsumi Maenaka, Yusuke Yanagi

Abstract

Measles is one of the most contagious viral diseases, and remains a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. The measles virus (MV), a member of the family Paramyxoviridae, enters cells through a cellular receptor, the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM), CD46 or nectin-4. Entry is mediated by two MV envelope glycoproteins, the hemagglutinin (H) and the fusion (F) protein. The H protein mediates receptor attachment, while the F protein causes membrane fusion. The interaction between the H and F proteins is essential to initiate the cell entry process. Recently determined crystal structures of the MV-H protein unbound and bound to SLAM or CD46 have provided insights into paramyxovirus entry and the effectiveness of measles vaccine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Lithuania 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,665,808
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,178
of 26,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,547
of 183,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#38
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.