↓ Skip to main content

Fate and Survival of Campylobacter coli in Swine Manure at Various Temperatures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate and Survival of Campylobacter coli in Swine Manure at Various Temperatures
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuan Thanh Bui, Anders Wolff, Mogen Madsen, Dang Duong Bang

Abstract

Campylobacter coli is the most common Campylobacter species found in pig (95%), but the ability of this bacterium to survive in swine manure as well as the potential for causing human illness are poorly understood. We present here laboratory-scale experiments to investigate the effect of temperature on the survival of C. coli in spiked swine manure samples at temperatures from 4 to 52°C. The survival of C. coli during storage for 30 days was studied by three different methods: bacterial culture (plate counting), DNA qPCR, and mRNA RT-qPCR. The results indicate that C. coli could survive in swine manure up to 24 days at 4°C. At higher temperatures, this bacterium survived only 7 days (15°C) or 6 days (22°C) of storage. The survival of C. coli was extremely short (few hours) in samples incubated at 42 and 52°C. The results from the RT-qPCR method were consistent with the data from the bacterial culture method, indicating that it detected only viable C. coli cells, thus eliminating false-positive resulting from DNA from dead C. coli cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Engineering 3 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,355,520
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,927
of 24,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,126
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#49
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.