↓ Skip to main content

Prospects for the Study of Evolution in the Deep Biosphere

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospects for the Study of Evolution in the Deep Biosphere
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer F. Biddle, Jason B. Sylvan, William J. Brazelton, Benjamin J. Tully, Katrina J. Edwards, Craig L. Moyer, John F. Heidelberg, William C. Nelson

Abstract

Since the days of Darwin, scientists have used the framework of the theory of evolution to explore the interconnectedness of life on Earth and adaptation of organisms to the ever-changing environment. The advent of molecular biology has advanced and accelerated the study of evolution by allowing direct examination of the genetic material that ultimately determines the phenotypes upon which selection acts. The study of evolution has been furthered through examination of microbial evolution, with large population numbers, short generation times, and easily extractable DNA. Such work has spawned the study of microbial biogeography, with the realization that concepts developed in population genetics may be applicable to microbial genomes (Martiny et al., 2006; Manhes and Velicer, 2011). Microbial biogeography and adaptation has been examined in many different environments. Here we argue that the deep biosphere is a unique environment for the study of evolution and list specific factors that can be considered and where the studies may be performed. This publication is the result of the NSF-funded Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI) theme team on Evolution (www.darkenergybiosphere.org).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Canada 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 116 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 29%
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 45%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 14%
Environmental Science 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,874,979
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,344
of 24,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,434
of 244,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.