↓ Skip to main content

Engineering microbial consortia to enhance biomining and bioremediation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering microbial consortia to enhance biomining and bioremediation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl D. Brune, Travis S. Bayer

Abstract

In natural environments microorganisms commonly exist as communities of multiple species that are capable of performing more varied and complicated tasks than clonal populations. Synthetic biologists have engineered clonal populations with characteristics such as differentiation, memory, and pattern formation, which are usually associated with more complex multicellular organisms. The prospect of designing microbial communities has alluring possibilities for environmental, biomedical, and energy applications, and is likely to reveal insight into how natural microbial consortia function. Cell signaling and communication pathways between different species are likely to be key processes for designing novel functions in synthetic and natural consortia. Recent efforts to engineer synthetic microbial interactions will be reviewed here, with particular emphasis given to research with significance for industrial applications in the field of biomining and bioremediation of acid mine drainage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 404 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 23%
Researcher 74 18%
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Student > Master 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 16%
Environmental Science 49 12%
Engineering 29 7%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 87 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#461,722
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#227
of 24,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,611
of 244,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.