↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Analysis of Environmental Impacts on Nitrous Oxide Release in Response to N Amendment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-Analysis of Environmental Impacts on Nitrous Oxide Release in Response to N Amendment
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma L. Aronson, Steven D. Allison

Abstract

Atmospheric nitrous oxide (N(2)O) accounts for approximately 5% of the global greenhouse effect and destroys stratospheric ozone. Soils are the most important source of N(2)O, which is produced during nitrification and denitrification. To assess the impact of environmental variables and ecosystems on N(2)O flux, we performed a meta-analysis comparing N(2)O flux in N amended and matched control plots in non-agricultural soils. We found that N(2)O release increased with N amendment in the short term. Although there were few studies in shrubland, this ecosystem showed the greatest response. The N(2)O response to N amendment was greater in year-round studies and in studies with more measurements, but lower in longer studies. The N(2)O response was greater at higher latitudes and precipitation rates. We also observed an unexpected 55% decline in the N(2)O response to N amendment over the 23 years covered by the studies. This pattern may reflect a suppression of the N(2)O response from long-term N deposition accumulation, particularly in temperate regions. Although short term increases in reactive N entering natural systems may cause positive feedbacks to the release of N(2)O, this effect may diminish over time in locations with high rates of N deposition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 30%
Environmental Science 16 18%
Engineering 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,751,974
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,840
of 24,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,692
of 244,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#70
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.