↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial oxygen production in the dark

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial oxygen production in the dark
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina F. Ettwig, Daan R. Speth, Joachim Reimann, Ming L. Wu, Mike S. M. Jetten, Jan T. Keltjens

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) are among nature's most powerful electron acceptors. In recent years it became clear that microorganisms can take advantage of the oxidizing power of these compounds to degrade aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. For two unrelated bacterial species, the "NC10" phylum bacterium "Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera" and the γ-proteobacterial strain HdN1 it has been suggested that under anoxic conditions with nitrate and/or nitrite, monooxygenases are used for methane and hexadecane oxidation, respectively. No degradation was observed with nitrous oxide only. Similarly, "aerobic" pathways for hydrocarbon degradation are employed by (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria, which are known to produce oxygen from chlorite [Formula: see text]. In the anaerobic methanotroph M. oxyfera, which lacks identifiable enzymes for nitrogen formation, substrate activation in the presence of nitrite was directly associated with both oxygen and nitrogen formation. These findings strongly argue for the role of NO, or an oxygen species derived from it, in the activation reaction of methane. Although oxygen generation elegantly explains the utilization of "aerobic" pathways under anoxic conditions, the underlying mechanism is still elusive. In this perspective, we review the current knowledge about intra-aerobic pathways, their potential presence in other organisms, and identify candidate enzymes related to quinol-dependent NO reductases (qNORs) that might be involved in the formation of oxygen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 181 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 27%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 33 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 29%
Environmental Science 29 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 12%
Engineering 14 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 5%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 40 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,616,366
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,276
of 24,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,097
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#51
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.