↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and opportunities in estimating viral genetic diversity from next-generation sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges and opportunities in estimating viral genetic diversity from next-generation sequencing data
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niko Beerenwinkel, Huldrych F. Günthard, Volker Roth, Karin J. Metzner

Abstract

Many viruses, including the clinically relevant RNA viruses HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) and HCV (hepatitis C virus), exist in large populations and display high genetic heterogeneity within and between infected hosts. Assessing intra-patient viral genetic diversity is essential for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of viruses, for designing effective vaccines, and for the success of antiviral therapy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allow the rapid and cost-effective acquisition of thousands to millions of short DNA sequences from a single sample. However, this approach entails several challenges in experimental design and computational data analysis. Here, we review the entire process of inferring viral diversity from sample collection to computing measures of genetic diversity. We discuss sample preparation, including reverse transcription and amplification, and the effect of experimental conditions on diversity estimates due to in vitro base substitutions, insertions, deletions, and recombination. The use of different NGS platforms and their sequencing error profiles are compared in the context of various applications of diversity estimation, ranging from the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) to the reconstruction of whole-genome haplotypes. We describe the statistical and computational challenges arising from these technical artifacts, and we review existing approaches, including available software, for their solution. Finally, we discuss open problems, and highlight successful biomedical applications and potential future clinical use of NGS to estimate viral diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 343 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 100 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 21%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 32 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 16%
Computer Science 22 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 5%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 39 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,020,322
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,546
of 24,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,442
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#124
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.