↓ Skip to main content

Soil nitrate reducing processes – drivers, mechanisms for spatial variation, and significance for nitrous oxide production

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soil nitrate reducing processes – drivers, mechanisms for spatial variation, and significance for nitrous oxide production
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeline Giles, Nicholas Morley, Elizabeth M. Baggs, Tim J. Daniell

Abstract

The microbial processes of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) are two important nitrate reducing mechanisms in soil, which are responsible for the loss of nitrate ([Formula: see text]) and production of the potent greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N(2)O). A number of factors are known to control these processes, including O(2) concentrations and moisture content, N, C, pH, and the size and community structure of nitrate reducing organisms responsible for the processes. There is an increasing understanding associated with many of these controls on flux through the nitrogen cycle in soil systems. However, there remains uncertainty about how the nitrate reducing communities are linked to environmental variables and the flux of products from these processes. The high spatial variability of environmental controls and microbial communities across small sub centimeter areas of soil may prove to be critical in determining why an understanding of the links between biotic and abiotic controls has proved elusive. This spatial effect is often overlooked as a driver of nitrate reducing processes. An increased knowledge of the effects of spatial heterogeneity in soil on nitrate reduction processes will be fundamental in understanding the drivers, location, and potential for N(2)O production from soils.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 351 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 24%
Researcher 67 18%
Student > Master 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 66 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 36%
Environmental Science 73 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Engineering 16 4%
Other 20 5%
Unknown 92 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,177,789
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,595
of 24,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,841
of 244,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.