↓ Skip to main content

Aspergillus fumigatus melanins: interference with the host endocytosis pathway and impact on virulence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspergillus fumigatus melanins: interference with the host endocytosis pathway and impact on virulence
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thorsten Heinekamp, Andreas Thywißen, Juliane Macheleidt, Sophia Keller, Vito Valiante, Axel A. Brakhage

Abstract

The opportunistic human pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus produces at least two types of melanin, namely pyomelanin and dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin. Pyomelanin is produced during tyrosine catabolism via accumulation of homogentisic acid. Although pyomelanin protects the fungus against reactive oxygen species (ROS) and acts as a defense compound in response to cell wall stress, mutants deficient for pyomelanin biosynthesis do not differ in virulence when tested in a murine infection model for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. DHN melanin is responsible for the characteristic gray-greenish color of A. fumigatus conidia. Mutants lacking a functional polyketide synthase PksP, the enzyme responsible for the initial step in DHN-melanin formation, i.e., the synthesis of naphthopyrone, produce white spores and are attenuated in virulence. The activity of PksP was found to be essential not only for inhibition of apoptosis of phagocytes by interfering with the host PI3K/Akt signaling cascade but also for effective inhibition of acidification of conidia-containing phagolysosomes. These features allow A. fumigatus to survive in phagocytes and thereby to escape from human immune effector cells and to become a successful pathogen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 22%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 56 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,178,948
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,097
of 24,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,696
of 280,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#264
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.