↓ Skip to main content

Investigating antibiotic resistance in non-clinical environments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating antibiotic resistance in non-clinical environments
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Walsh

Abstract

There have been many calls for more information about the natural resistome and these have also highlighted the importance of understanding the soil resistome in the preservation of antibiotics for the treatment of infections. However, to date there have been few studies which have investigated the culturable soil resistome, which highlights the difficulties faced by microbiologists in designing these experiments to produce meaningful data. The World Health Organization definition of resistance is the most fitting to non-clinical environmental studies: antimicrobial resistance is resistance of a microorganism to an antimicrobial medicine to which it was previously sensitive. The ideal investigation of non-clinical environments for antibiotic resistance of clinical relevance would be using standardized guidelines and breakpoints. This review outlines different definitions and methodologies used to understand antibiotic resistance and suggests how this can be performed outside of the clinical environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 35%
Environmental Science 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,339,040
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,401
of 24,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,401
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#96
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.