↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Production of Isoprenoids Enabled by Synthetic Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial Production of Isoprenoids Enabled by Synthetic Biology
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl M. Immethun, Allison G. Hoynes-O’Connor, Andrea Balassy, Tae Seok Moon

Abstract

Microorganisms transform inexpensive carbon sources into highly functionalized compounds without toxic by-product generation or significant energy consumption. By redesigning the natural biosynthetic pathways in an industrially suited host, microbial cell factories can produce complex compounds for a variety of industries. Isoprenoids include many medically important compounds such as antioxidants and anticancer and antimalarial drugs, all of which have been produced microbially. While a biosynthetic pathway could be simply transferred to the production host, the titers would become economically feasible when it is rationally designed, built, and optimized through synthetic biology tools. These tools have been implemented by a number of research groups, with new tools pledging further improvements in yields and expansion to new medically relevant compounds. This review focuses on the microbial production of isoprenoids for the health industry and the advancements though synthetic biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 174 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 22%
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 10 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 22%
Engineering 15 8%
Chemistry 8 4%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,043,898
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,535
of 24,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,149
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.