↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
350 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
646 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Beier, Stefan Bertilsson

Abstract

Chitin is one the most abundant polymers in nature and interacts with both carbon and nitrogen cycles. Processes controlling chitin degradation are summarized in reviews published some 20 years ago, but the recent use of culture-independent molecular methods has led to a revised understanding of the ecology and biochemistry of this process and the organisms involved. This review summarizes different mechanisms and the principal steps involved in chitin degradation at a molecular level while also discussing the coupling of community composition to measured chitin hydrolysis activities and substrate uptake. Ecological consequences are then highlighted and discussed with a focus on the cross feeding associated with the different habitats that arise because of the need for extracellular hydrolysis of the chitin polymer prior to metabolic use. Principal environmental drivers of chitin degradation are identified which are likely to influence both community composition of chitin degrading bacteria and measured chitin hydrolysis activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 646 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 634 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 20%
Researcher 91 14%
Student > Master 88 14%
Student > Bachelor 79 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 4%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 152 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 16%
Environmental Science 58 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 6%
Engineering 14 2%
Other 58 9%
Unknown 172 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,585,170
of 24,394,175 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,931
of 27,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,175
of 289,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#112
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.