↓ Skip to main content

Do antibiotic residues in soils play a role in amplification and transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria in cattle populations?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do antibiotic residues in soils play a role in amplification and transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria in cattle populations?
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas R. Call, Louise Matthews, Murugan Subbiah, Jinxin Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
New Zealand 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,209
of 29,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,051
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#173
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.