↓ Skip to main content

Current scenario of peptide-based drugs: the key roles of cationic antitumor and antiviral peptides

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current scenario of peptide-based drugs: the key roles of cationic antitumor and antiviral peptides
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly C. L. Mulder, Loiane A. Lima, Vivian J. Miranda, Simoni C. Dias, Octávio L. Franco

Abstract

Cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and host defense peptides (HDPs) show vast potential as peptide-based drugs. Great effort has been made in order to exploit their mechanisms of action, aiming to identify their targets as well as to enhance their activity and bioavailability. In this review, we will focus on both naturally occurring and designed antiviral and antitumor cationic peptides, including those here called promiscuous, in which multiple targets are associated with a single peptide structure. Emphasis will be given to their biochemical features, selectivity against extra targets, and molecular mechanisms. Peptides which possess antitumor activity against different cancer cell lines will be discussed, as well as peptides which inhibit virus replication, focusing on their applications for human health, animal health and agriculture, and their potential as new therapeutic drugs. Moreover, the current scenario for production and the use of nanotechnology as delivery tool for both classes of cationic peptides, as well as the perspectives on improving them is considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 267 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 46 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 23%
Chemistry 32 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 58 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,932,073
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,234
of 24,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,780
of 280,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#110
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.