↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of survival, responses and sources of Salmonella in low-moisture environments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of survival, responses and sources of Salmonella in low-moisture environments
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Finn, Orla Condell, Peter McClure, Alejandro Amézquita, Séamus Fanning

Abstract

Some Enterobacteriaceae possess the ability to survive in low-moisture environments for extended periods of time. Many of the reported food-borne outbreaks associated with low-moisture foods involve Salmonella contamination. The control of Salmonella in low-moisture foods and their production environments represents a significant challenge for all food manufacturers. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge with respect to Salmonella survival in intermediate- and low-moisture food matrices and their production environments. The mechanisms utilized by this bacterium to ensure their survival in these dry conditions remain to be fully elucidated, however, in depth transcriptomic data is now beginning to emerge regarding this observation. Earlier research work described the effect(s) that low-moisture can exert on the long-term persistence and heat tolerance of Salmonella, however, data are also now available highlighting the potential cross-tolerance to other stressors including commonly used microbicidal agents. Sources and potential control measures to reduce the risk of contamination will be explored. By extending our understanding of these geno- and phenotypes, we may be able to exploit them to improve food safety and protect public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 433 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Researcher 42 10%
Other 22 5%
Other 62 14%
Unknown 109 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 166 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 5%
Engineering 13 3%
Environmental Science 11 3%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 137 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,836,295
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,274
of 26,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,981
of 285,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#23
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.